![]() Comparison of cephalometric readings between manual tracing and digital software tracing: A pilot study. How to cite this URL: Kamath M K, Arun A V. ![]() How to cite this article: Kamath M K, Arun A V. Keywords: Cephalometric digital tracing landmarks. The variation lies in the difference in identification of the hard tissue landmarks. The remaining parameters do not show statistical difference.Ĭonclusion: The results show a statistical difference between manual and digital tracing. Results: SNA, SNB, lower incisor to NB angle, and linear values show statistically significant differences. Following this, the radiographs were uploaded in the FACAD digital software for digital tracing. The radiographs were manually traced, and the readings were recorded. Six hard tissue landmarks were identified, and Steiner's analysis was carried out. Materials and Methods: The conventional lateral cephalograms of twenty participants were obtained. Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze and compare the cephalometric readings between manual tracings with digital software tracings using Steiner's analysis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |